Return to Answer

To quote a part of the current policy that was added in a later edit:

[...] we could allow system tags to be edited in without the OP’s input after a Meta discussion agrees that the situation is “safe” to edit. [...]

And to quote the user who suggested that policy describing the policy elsewhere:

[...] The policy exists as it does because we don’t have the best vision on any ad hoc decisions made by individual users and that’s a problem, but this isn’t a decision by any individual user—this is a Meta discussion, where we can gather consensus. [...]

[...] The policy would not allow an individual poster to edit this question, but with Meta consensus [it could be] [...]

[...] This cannot be generalized; we can discuss this question but not any broader category of questions that are in some way “like” this one. A Meta consensus is necessary for this kind of edit.

This answer is not saying that adding the dnd-5e tag doesn't violate policy. Doing so without consensus does violate the policy. This is trying to get at a consensus.

Are any of those likely? We can't know (we don't have all the data in the universe).

This answer is not saying that adding the dnd-5e tag doesn't violate policy. Doing so without consensus does violate the policy. This is trying to get at a consensus.

Are any of those likely? We can't truly know (we don't have all the data in the universe).

This answer is not saying that adding the dnd-5e tag doesn't violate policy. Doing so without consensus does violate the policy. This is trying to get a consensus.

[...] The policy exists as it does because we don’t have the best vision on any ad hoc decisions made by individual users and that’s a problem, but this isn’t a decision by any individual user—this is a Meta discussion, where we can gather consensus. [...]

The Question As Originally Asked (emphasis all mine):

To quote a part of the current policy that was added in a later edit:

And to quote the user who suggested that policy describing the policy elsewhere:

[...] The policy exists as it does because we don’t have the best vision on any ad hoc decisions made by individual users and that’s a problem, but this isn’t a decision by any individual user—this is a Meta discussion, where we can gather consensus. [...]

[...] The policy would not allow an individual poster to edit this question, but with Meta consensus [it could be] [...]

[...] This cannot be generalized; we can discuss this question but not any broader category of questions that are in some way “like” this one. A Meta consensus is necessary for this kind of edit.

This answer is not saying that adding the dnd-5e tag doesn't violate policy. Doing so without consensus does violate the policy. This is trying to get at a consensus.

The Question As Originally Asked (all emphasis mine):

"Wildemount" is a location/setting used in the Explorer's Guide to Wildemonte books, which was only published for 5e-dnd.

"Id Insinuation" is a spell that can be found in an Unearthed Arcana for the 5e-dnd, though it can also be found many other places (like Pathfinder or older editions of DnD and elsewhere).

"Wildemount" is a location/setting used in the Explorer's Guide to Wildemonte books, which was only published for dnd-5e.

"Id Insinuation" is a spell that can be found in an Unearthed Arcana for the dnd-5e, though it can also be found many other places (like Pathfinder or older editions of DnD and elsewhere).