Timeline for What do we do when a question is covered as a subset of another, but the answers are insufficient for answering the special case?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2020 at 3:07 | comment | added | V2Blast Mod | "having specific questioned subsets of broad questions answered separately vastly improves readability and searchability of the entire information set" - This sentence is... a bit hard to read. I assume the intent is to say that if people look at a broad Q&A (e.g. a general question about casting spells learned from Magic Initiate using slots) but still have questions about specific instances of that question (e.g. whether EK/AT specifically can cast Magic Initiate spells using slots), it's beneficial to the whole set of info to answer those specific edge-cases in a separate Q&A. Right? | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | Exempt-Medic | How does this approach handle cases such as "If I multiclass into 2 or more spellcasting classes, how do I determine my known/prepared spells?" which was created specifically so that technically more specific questions would be closed? Another example is "How do I determine how many spell slots I have when multiclassing?" which was done for a similar reason | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 13:57 | comment | added | NotArch | This is a pretty good approach, but often times the missing answers showcase the original question having incomplete answers. This would then create an issue of questions with incomplete answers, no? | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 6:23 | history | answered | user2754 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |