Timeline for What benefit does the "rules-lawyering" tag bring to our community?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 22, 2013 at 13:32 | history | edited | mxyzplkMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 529 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2013 at 12:18 | comment | added | Wibbs | Also, Rules Lawyering has massive negative connotations to many players, and I wonder whether it tends to colour the answers that questions tagged with it get... | |
| Jun 20, 2013 at 1:08 | comment | added | dlras2 | Also, [rules-as-written] has the benefit of making askers think a little bit more (maybe.) That is, most questions are about rules, but I believe most people understand that rules-as-written has a more specific connotation. | |
| Jun 20, 2013 at 1:02 | comment | added | dlras2 | I think I agree - I actually suggested a RAW tag in my initial wording but ended up editing it out. It also has a less pedantic, nit-picky connotation, at least to me. Asking "what are the rules-as-written" seems much friendlier than "rules-lawyering." | |
| Jun 19, 2013 at 23:27 | history | answered | mxyzplkMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |