Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:45 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.stackexchange.com/
Dec 13, 2014 at 0:54 history edited doppelgreener
edited tags
Sep 22, 2014 at 2:18 vote accept xenoterracide
Sep 19, 2014 at 15:08 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackRPG/status/512981637718487042
Sep 16, 2014 at 2:07 history edited mxyzplkMod CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Sep 16, 2014 at 1:58 answer added Frames Catherine White timeline score: 0
Sep 15, 2014 at 3:52 answer added doppelgreener timeline score: 11
Sep 13, 2014 at 18:11 comment added mxyzplk Mod You all may want to discuss this in chat. So far this is a huge mess with answers largely augmented by 50 comments and with no answer over 2 votes so as a mod I declare this currently unactionable. Maybe discuss it then put together a consensus plan and get folks to vote for it?
Sep 13, 2014 at 2:25 answer added Frames Catherine White timeline score: 0
Sep 12, 2014 at 22:33 history edited xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0
added 140 characters in body
Sep 12, 2014 at 22:02 history edited xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0
added 845 characters in body
Sep 10, 2014 at 12:37 comment added xenoterracide @Oxinabox looking at the answers it's hard to say what a concensus was about usage. Perhaps you should just sum it up in what you believe it was answer here. Because obviously there's still some confusion given the fussing around the dual tagging of rpg.stackexchange.com/q/47454/1015 and it didn't well covert the problem of 2e on specific games.
Sep 10, 2014 at 6:21 comment added Frames Catherine White We have a discussion, on the particularities of the nwod-god-machine tag here, meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/4773/… I think what is going on there is more or less right for what is on and off topic for, [nwod-god-machine] (to be renamed nwod-2 or similar). Discussion of what is on or off topic for that particular tag and its interaction with the [nwod] tag should go there. Though i think a strong concensus has been reached (comminty view could change), and has been implemented.
Sep 9, 2014 at 19:51 comment added xenoterracide @Jadasc I personally concur, but not everyone sees it that way, and get upity when both are used. So I'm trying to solve their problem, in a way that also works for me.
Sep 9, 2014 at 19:47 comment added Jadasc @xenoterracide From my point of view? If you're legitimately using a blend of pre- and post-GMC content in your game and are okay with answers that reference both, it's cool to have both tags.
Sep 9, 2014 at 19:45 comment added xenoterracide @Jadasc I would care less if there was less, you're tagging these wrong, no don't add both systems, no don't create a new tag because... no that doesn't apply. I basically want to resolve the issue so I can stop dealing with being told I tag every questions wrongly because I'm using nwod 1 and 2.
Sep 9, 2014 at 19:41 comment added Jadasc @Emrakul Especially since it's not like the tag confusion is stopping people from asking, finding, or answering questions. It's almost purely aesthetic on the part of tag-fanciers. :)
Sep 9, 2014 at 3:21 comment added user8248 This whole "World of Darkness" mess really is a world of darkness, isn't it.
Sep 9, 2014 at 3:13 comment added Frames Catherine White xenoterracide and I generally have a disagreement about tagging and wod editions. I am busy at the moment, but I will return to this discussion after more thought later this week. I will return with diagrams showing the state of the world first, then later return with my opinions on how our tagging should reflect the world as represented in the diagrams. Til then I will be keeping up with maintaining: meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/4773/…
Sep 9, 2014 at 3:00 comment added Frames Catherine White At some stage this week I will product a number of graphics to aid in this discussion.
Sep 9, 2014 at 1:43 answer added Jadasc timeline score: 2
Sep 8, 2014 at 11:22 comment added Jadasc Welcome to the world-of-darkness fandom. (That's fandom of the tag, as opposed to just fandom of the subject matter. :) We've been trying to balance useful and clear for a while now.
Sep 8, 2014 at 5:33 comment added SevenSidedDie Before proceeding, it's useful to review the discussions from Dec 2011 and from Apr 2013. Yes, it's a mess. Various efforts to iron it out are ongoing, but somewhat on pause due waiting on the recent edition renaming's effect on the community to shake out. We could really use your expertise for the taggging cleanup, once you've reviewed the state of affairs, since we've few WoD experts.
Sep 8, 2014 at 5:06 history edited xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0
added 182 characters in body
Sep 8, 2014 at 5:00 history edited xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0
added 182 characters in body
Sep 8, 2014 at 4:49 answer added xenoterracide timeline score: 0
Sep 8, 2014 at 4:48 history edited xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Sep 8, 2014 at 4:42 history asked xenoterracide CC BY-SA 3.0