Skip to main content

Timeline for Burninate [draconic-bloodline]?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 13, 2017 at 15:29 comment added SevenSidedDie Mod @doppelgreener With pleasure!
Dec 13, 2017 at 15:29 history edited SevenSidedDieMod CC BY-SA 3.0
status-completed
Dec 13, 2017 at 10:42 comment added doppelgreener Mod @SevenSidedDie This move has sat in high support for about a week now -- want to do the honours?
Dec 6, 2017 at 16:16 history edited SevenSidedDieMod CC BY-SA 3.0
revise to be just about merging, since as pointed out, a redirect is not supported by the evidence
Dec 6, 2017 at 16:10 comment added SevenSidedDie Mod @doppel Ah! "…nor does the current minimal usage suggest a redirection is needed." That is an excellent point about needs-based action. Enough that I'll revise the answer.
Dec 6, 2017 at 9:27 comment added doppelgreener Mod +1 to merge, but no to synonym. I agree with KRyan, and since it's minimal effort difference to choose not to create a synonym in the first place, we don't need to close that door nor create that meta work, nor does the current minimal usage suggest a redirection is needed. But I agree we don't need it right now as its own tag.
Dec 6, 2017 at 4:48 comment added SevenSidedDie Mod @KRyan That could happen, but in current practice it's = “sorcerer” and would be useful now. We don't usually worry about hypotheticals until they're non-hypothetical or there are extenuating circumstances; in this case the fix would be trivial if it that ever happens.
Dec 6, 2017 at 4:44 comment added KRyan I don’t really like synonym in this case. Maybe if re-creation keeps being a problem, but it’s just so easy to imagine game systems having something called “draconic bloodline” having nothing to do with anything called “sorcerer,” which could make this synonym awkward.
Dec 6, 2017 at 2:46 history answered SevenSidedDieMod CC BY-SA 3.0