Timeline for Should we be adding DNDBeyond links to old posts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 at 16:00 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie Mod | Yes, “necromancy” is not only fine here but considered good. I agree strongly on #2 though, that’s a good analysis of temporal utility. #3 I’m not sure is too much a concern: only suggested edits are worth rep, so few users could edit with that motive, and even then, it’s part of the intended process of learning what’s considered a good edit to suggest less-than-perfect edits. | |
| Jul 27, 2018 at 13:20 | comment | added | doppelgreener Mod | On #1: we'd prefer stuff get edited anyway, but managed in volume to not overwhelm the front page. We do not have "necromancy" on this site as something frowned upon since we consider questions to be timeless; rather there are badges for it (necromancer, archaeologist & others). The front page isn't for questions that need answering, it's for questions that have recent activity (for any reason, including something just received an edit that ought to have peer review). | |
| Jul 27, 2018 at 13:15 | history | answered | Quadratic Wizard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |