Skip to main content
Post Locked by linksassinMod
Notice added Obsolete by linksassinMod
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Thomas Markov, CommunityBot
Tweeted twitter.com/StackRPG/status/1044331050925793281
edited tags
Link
V2Blast
  • 50.3k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 51
added 630 characters in body
Source Link
doppelgreener Mod
  • 36.6k
  • 4
  • 171
  • 366

Note that these aren't wild guesses being made: they're not “this person mentioned wizards, it's probably D&D 5e”, but instead educated guesses or inferences made based on the content of the question we do have. Taking the most recent example cited just earlier today, our users' guesses were based on an exact quote and page number from the PHB lining up with the D&D 5e PHB—and those inferences were correct.

The main pragmatic reason remaining to enforce this policy is because it requires people to learn how to use the site before they can get answers.

I'd like us to examine this policy as a community, consider our options and the pros and cons, and work out what we'd like to do from here on. That could be a modification or it could be continuing with the policy exactly as-is, whatevermodifying it to be OK with some level of inferences—whatever we choose is valid—butvalid, but I'd like us to choose it because it's what looks like it should work well for us now in our current circumstances.

Given a fresh look: what do we want the policy here to be? How should we approach the idea of guessing the game system someone's using when it's unclear? If we're OK with some level of inference, what would that be?

The main pragmatic reason remaining to enforce this policy is because it requires people to learn how to use the site before they can get answers.

I'd like us to examine this policy as a community, consider our options and the pros and cons, and work out what we'd like to do from here on. That could be a modification or it could be continuing with the policy exactly as-is, whatever we choose is valid—but I'd like us to choose it because it's what looks like it should work well for us now in our current circumstances.

Given a fresh look: what do we want the policy here to be? How should we approach the idea of guessing the game system someone's using when it's unclear?

Note that these aren't wild guesses being made: they're not “this person mentioned wizards, it's probably D&D 5e”, but instead educated guesses or inferences made based on the content of the question we do have. Taking the most recent example cited just earlier today, our users' guesses were based on an exact quote and page number from the PHB lining up with the D&D 5e PHB—and those inferences were correct.

The main pragmatic reason remaining to enforce this policy is because it requires people to learn how to use the site before they can get answers.

I'd like us to examine this policy as a community, consider our options and the pros and cons, and work out what we'd like to do from here on. That could be a modification or it could be continuing with the policy exactly as-is, modifying it to be OK with some level of inferences—whatever we choose is valid, but I'd like us to choose it because it's what looks like it should work well for us now in our current circumstances.

Given a fresh look: what do we want the policy here to be? How should we approach the idea of guessing the game system someone's using when it's unclear? If we're OK with some level of inference, what would that be?

added 17 characters in body
Source Link
doppelgreener Mod
  • 36.6k
  • 4
  • 171
  • 366

From what we saw from the site's start in late 2010 up until ~2015 this policy made a lot of sense. If someone was unclear about their game they might be playing AD&D 2e or D&D 3.5e or Pathfinder or D&D 4e or D&D 5e (still brand new and not widely played). It was hard to know for sure (and we could rarely tell 3.5e or PF apart anyway) and fairly frequently something even weirder was going on like:

From the site's start in late 2010 up until ~2015 this policy made a lot of sense. If someone was unclear about their game they might be playing AD&D 2e or D&D 3.5e or Pathfinder or D&D 4e or D&D 5e (still brand new and not widely played). It was hard to know for sure (and we could rarely tell 3.5e or PF apart anyway) and fairly frequently something even weirder was going on like:

From what we saw from the site's start in late 2010 up until ~2015 this policy made a lot of sense. If someone was unclear about their game they might be playing AD&D 2e or D&D 3.5e or Pathfinder or D&D 4e or D&D 5e (still brand new and not widely played). It was hard to know for sure (and we could rarely tell 3.5e or PF apart anyway) and fairly frequently something even weirder was going on like:

deleted 23 characters in body
Source Link
doppelgreener Mod
  • 36.6k
  • 4
  • 171
  • 366
Loading
Source Link
doppelgreener Mod
  • 36.6k
  • 4
  • 171
  • 366
Loading