9 deleted 1 character in body
source | link

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remaining or being eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that the tag itself is the problem; as you've (mxy) been with this site since it'sits beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remaining or being eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that the tag itself is the problem; as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remaining or being eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that the tag itself is the problem; as you've (mxy) been with this site since its beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

8 deleted 1 character in body
source | link

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remainremaining or being eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that it is the tag itself is the problem, butproblem; as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remain or eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that it is the tag itself is the problem, but as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remaining or being eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that the tag itself is the problem; as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

7 added 11 characters in body
source | link

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag being to remain or eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that it is the tag itself is the problem, but as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery tag being to remain or eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in meta.

I am not convinced that it is the tag itself is the problem, but as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

A modest proposal: link this Answer to the FAQ or [help]

One of the best treatments of what that RPG-centric topic covers that I've read, in terms of how to understand that term and apply it. I am of the opinion that the term holds different connotations for different people, and that the latest question that re-raised this issue wasn't even about that tag in the first place.

That term is a part of our hobby; a thorough treatment of that aspect of the hobby ought to be a part of the library of expert answers that this stack curates. There is a core value in the SE/SO basic model that seeks a "searchable library of expert questions with expert answers." IMO we need to capture something expert for that part of the hobby, whether our hunger for perfect taggery results in the tag remain or eaten and disposed of through our digestive processes in this meta.

I am not convinced that it is the tag itself is the problem, but as you've (mxy) been with this site since it's beginning, your grasp of the community conflict well eclipses mine, as does doppel's experience in the conflict that this tag food fight has created over the course of this site's existence. Whether we are throwing out the baby with the bath water won't become evident until after such a decision is reached.

Sorry Jack, that's the best I can do at the moment.

6 deleted 7 characters in body
source | link
5 deleted 4 characters in body
source | link
4 added 271 characters in body
source | link
3 added 127 characters in body
source | link
2 added 63 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link