Timeline for Confusion regarding the "Good Subjective" post notice and the policy on backing up answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2019 at 14:44 | vote | accept | Exempt-Medic | ||
| Oct 10, 2019 at 18:00 | comment | added | Novak | This may be a quibble of phrasing, but I don't think the problem is that the meta is non-comprehensive. I think the problem is that it's being treated as comprehensive when it isn't-- and in fact when it can't be. Maybe we are using "comprehensive" in different ways. | |
| Oct 10, 2019 at 16:06 | comment | added | Exempt-Medic | Thank you for this. It's helped with a lot of my concerns that came from reading this answer which seems to say that explicit statement of personal experience is often claimed to be the only way to back up an answer, a thing I very much hoped (and am glad) was not the case. Though that may be how the policy is enforced I'm glad to see it is not how some moderators (or at least you) interpret the policy. | |
| Oct 10, 2019 at 11:52 | history | edited | doppelgreenerMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2019 at 11:47 | history | edited | doppelgreenerMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 45 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2019 at 11:41 | history | answered | doppelgreenerMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |