To be clear, I'm not complaining about this question being protected. But I'm not sure what prompted this question to be protected, given that as far as I know only one answer got into the stuff in the linked comment (and said answer was subsequently deleted)?
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
1
-
\$\begingroup\$ Presumably because it has 4 deleted answers so far, and since it's not about D&D 5e it's highly likely to get more. \$\endgroup\$– MinimanCommented Jun 18, 2019 at 0:02
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
1
There are actually 4 deleted answers to that question (which takes 10K rep to see).
2 of those answers are from brand new users, 1 is from a new user that has the associated bonus rep, and 1 is from a fairly new, low rep user.
None of the 4 answers submitted answer the question asking about canonical behaviour from Anima Beyond Fantasy sources and instead try to use real-world physics as a basis (something that doesn't generally apply to fantasy settings) or other off-topic-for-the-question reasoning.
I protected the question to simply prevent more off-topic/non-answer answers from new users swarming in.
-
\$\begingroup\$ Ah. I only caught the one that went on about behavior in AD&D. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 18, 2019 at 0:10