Is the [rage] tag useful?

Question

I see that we've recently gained rage as a new tag. It feels to me like it's both:

• too specific, as it's a tag for one specific character ability, and
• too general, as it could be for any game with a rage ability, even though different games might use the concept very differently.

If I had to make a decision on my own, I'd get rid of the tag. Thankfully, there's a whole community of more knowledgeable people than me here.

Is rage useful?

Answer 1

We don't have enough information yet to say.

Tagging on the Stack Exchange is an "emergent folksonomy," which means we let tags grow as the community sees a need and we don't curate tags until an actual problem crops up--then we fix that particular problem.

I'm not seeing any problem with rage yet, so let's wait and see how it does.

Answer 2

There is presently one question tagged rage: unsurprising as it is a new tag. Searching for "rage question", there are 113 questions across a multitude of systems that could benefit from it. There is a smaller number of hits from sneak-attack, another class feature, but all of these are associated with dnd or pathfinder. If sneak-attack merits a tag, rage certainly does.