Is a question asking for a resource list of places to find developer commentary on the construction of D&D 5e's rules on-topic and wanted?

Question

We have the following relevant Meta Q&A which covers the topicality of asking for commentary on specific rules (they are currently considered off-topic):

• Are questions about rule intent on topic?

However we now also have the following Mainsite question:

• Where can I find official commentaries by the D&D 5e designers on why they designed certain rules the way they did?

Is such a question workable or on-topic for this site? It would amount to listing things such as the Dragon Talk Podcast, Sage Advice Compendium, Twitter, YouTube, and perhaps also using the WayBack Machine to find things like the Dragon Article Archives.

Something I'm at least seeing is a similarity between such a question and the following Meta post which is effectively a resource list:

• I've been told my question is better suited to a forum, but where should I go?

Of course, there's a glaringly massive difference; the above post is broad and applies to any question which fits better at a forum whereas the sort of post I'm asking about applies entirely and exclusively to the fifth edition of Dungeons & Dragons. This gives me worries about the site seeming even more to be a D&D 5e site if we had such a Q&A catered specifically to this one game and not any others. Thus, I'm left wondering two things:

Is this sort of question on-topic? Regardless, is this a question we even want (would allowing it cause harm)?

Answer 1

It is off topic on rpg.se because recommendation/shopping questions are off topic -game-recs, but also tool and resource and site recs. See Are tool recommendation questions on topic?

We have a list of forums on Meta because it’s off-topic for the main site as a rec question, but we felt having a “where to go when you get told to go to a forum” list was useful at a site meta level. I do not think rules research for one game is similarly useful at a site administration level so would vote to close such a question on meta.

Answer 2

It's trivially editable-- instead of asking where it should ask how, the answer to which is probably 'go to such and such a site', but that's allowed.