The above question was edited from this state to this one. This can also be looked at on the revisions page. I am wondering if this edit was an edit too far, that is, if it made a significant enough change to the question without the OP's say so that it should be undone.
Yes, this was an edit too far
The original form of the question asked the following:
Now, I was wondering what was the reasoning behind the choice of making a single initiative roll at the start of the fight, was it for the sake of simplicity or is there something else?
Furthermore, what else do you think we should absolutely change to keep the game balanced?
The current form of the question, however, asks this:
But just how broad of a change is this? What else can we expect this house rule to change about the game?
The question went from asking about designer intentions and what other houserules should be implemented alongside the one in question to asking about what the ramifications of the houserule are. These are completely and fundamentally different questions, and so the edit was too significant and should be undone.