3
\$\begingroup\$

I recently posted a question about larp on the main boards, as I was curious about some of the different styles of larp that existed. Mainly how they handled combat. I was expecting three answers, or styles (Along with more detail than I could give): Full-contact, low-contact and no contact, which would have been easier to tag. Instead the post contains a ton of different styles, and I don't know how to tag questions about larp.

This became an issue in one of my last larp questions, as it mattered that I was talking about a no-stab, felt-blow style larp. As opposed to a stab-safe, full-force larp.

How should we be tagging? Do we even want new tags? Or should we just stick with and clarify in the question?

\$\endgroup\$
8
\$\begingroup\$

I would clarify in the question given the current volume of LARP questions.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ That said if people are using a specific LARP system, I see no harm in having a tag for it. \$\endgroup\$ – C. Ross Jan 11 '12 at 12:59
0
\$\begingroup\$

If we have tags for different RPG systems, we should have tags for different LRP systems. I see no problems in having lrp-combat as a tag and lrp-combat-safe, lrp-combat-full and the like...

I suggest we have them as lrp-SYSTEM to avoid confusion but that's just a suggestion. Although this is probably not a good idea -- see comments.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are they named similarly enough to existing systems that we would need to prefix them with lrp- or larp-? If not, propose we leave off the prefix. We don't have all that many characters in tags as it is. \$\endgroup\$ – C. Ross Jan 11 '12 at 11:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @C.Ross: I have no idea. If there is no confusion, then we can drop any pre or post fix. \$\endgroup\$ – Sardathrion - against SE abuse Jan 11 '12 at 12:02
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I originally thought we could group them due to combat type, not system. That way combat questions such as my two weapon gighting one has some context. \$\endgroup\$ – Pureferret Jan 11 '12 at 12:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Concur with @Pureferret: for combat LARPs, the combat style is probably more important than the system for many questions we get. (Rules questions in combat LARPs are likely to be fewer and more system-specific.) I think we're better with larp-combat and some variants, distinguished from non-combat LRPs which we should tag with something like freeform. That said, do we actually have enough weapon questions to be worth tagging as opposed to just specifying in the question? \$\endgroup\$ – Tynam Jan 12 '13 at 22:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .