I am having problems on deciding which answers to accept on Questions like Rules of player inventions or, perhaps a better example, creating emotions. I mean, strictly speaking, there is no "right" answer, just a lot of house rules and different techniques to go about it.
I finally decided to accept an answer that was, in my opinion, very well thought-out, but that does not mean that the other answers are inferior or, god forbid, wrong.
I mean, this is not supposed to be my personal Q&A-site, but a site where everyone can find good answers on questions that have already been posted. And some people only read the accepted answer.
Do we always need to have 'accepted' answers? suggested to use the CW function for this kind of question, but it is one year old, and in that time, the general policy on CWs has changed, and before I start marking almost all of my posts CW, I thought I would ask here (especially because I as a non-moderator can't even mark them as CW).
Another things to consider is that I almost always add an example, and many of the answers then focus on the example instead of the general question, which would make it unfit for a CW.
So, should I accept no answer at all? Or the answer that is the best, in my opinion, but might not be the best for a random person strolling onto the site? Or the one with the most upvotes after X days? Or just (let mods) CW the whole question?