1
\$\begingroup\$

Possible Duplicate:
Is there a functional purpose to putting things in code text here?

SteveC is editing a lot of other users' questions and answers to put the names of books, place names and races in backticks, which highlights them like this.

Is this a good idea? Should we ask him to stop?

\$\endgroup\$

marked as duplicate by Jadasc, Joe Dovahkiin, mxyzplk May 25 '12 at 3:05

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Check out my question, linked above. \$\endgroup\$ – Jadasc May 24 '12 at 20:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks. I've answered there and voted to close my question as a duplicate. \$\endgroup\$ – Joe Dovahkiin May 24 '12 at 21:25
6
\$\begingroup\$

I'm not a big user here, but here's my two cents:

I could see highlighting certain specific game terms, when they are a big deal to the overall context of the post. Like, I dunno, highlighting class abilities for D&D 3/4 does make the text a bit more readable in some ways. It sorta stops you a little and says, "Here, here is the thing you should look up." Actual links to some kind of reference thingy would be preferable, though.

It seems absolutely pointless to highlight fictional place names.

Coming here without any foreknowledge of the site's style, seeing lots and lots of highlight text in one paragraph was really jarring and didn't really make the text easier to read.

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .