# Is the [leaving-player] tag a necessary addition?

I notice that a 'leaving-player' tag has been added. My personal opinion is that it is unnecessary, but want to try to get a consensus before going ahead and rolling back edits to the questions where it has been added.

• No, it sucks, burn it with fire. Dec 4 '13 at 22:41
• Although, those questions do reveal that social and groups seem like inconsistently used synonyms (some have one, others have the other, for no good reason). Dec 4 '13 at 23:45
• Suggest [leaving-player] synonyms to [groups]? Almost every question about players leaving is about group dynamics/management. It may be a useful synonym to catch people typing leav into the tag field. Dec 5 '13 at 1:10

I see nothing that the tag adds that isn't covered by , or even things like and such if necessary. I believe it's a bit overly specific.

It could lead to a slippery slope of "sub-tags" and eventually we'd have tags like .

• I endeadened the tag. Dec 6 '13 at 1:07
• Though there may be a case for player-hygiene... Dec 7 '13 at 16:13
• I'd almost want to support that tag! Not that any of my players have that issue, thankfully. Dec 7 '13 at 19:04
• Does this tag provide extra context on the question?

No. How would you even ask this question without putting this information into the question itself?

• Can you be an expert on the topic of "leaving-player?"

That seems rather too specific.

• I’d be very concerned for someone who claimed that particular expertise... Dec 5 '13 at 17:26