With D&D 5e's Basic Rules released today I think that we should make 5e the default tag that shows up and make dnd-next the synonym (its the other way around currently).
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
Add a comment
|
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
3
I concur. We should have dnd-5e as the "real" tag, because "Dungeons & Dragons" is what it's being called, and it's the 5th in this particular edition-numbering series.
Then dnd-next should be a synonym of dnd-5e, since consensus seems to be to not have a separate tag for the playtest period rules.
answered Jul 4 '14 at 0:06
-
1\$\begingroup\$ How is the internet in general referring to it? \$\endgroup\$ Jul 4 '14 at 0:17
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Internet seems to be referring to it as the 5th edition, and D&D next for obvious historical reasons. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 4 '14 at 2:02
-
2\$\begingroup\$ For future readers: per the linked meta, [dnd-next-playtest] did eventually end up getting made as a separate tag from [dnd-5e]. \$\endgroup\$ Aug 2 '21 at 19:20
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
2
I think there's some value at this point in separating them. The DnD Next questions deal with playtest-specific issues in some cases, so I would be more inclined to have [dnd-5e] and [dnd-5e-playtest] with [dnd-next] linked to the latter. Probably we should also go and look at which questions are still relevant to 5e (based on the Basic Rules) and tag them as both.
-
\$\begingroup\$ See this answer, The mods and the community seem to think that ultimately its better to have 1 tag per edition \$\endgroup\$ Jul 3 '14 at 18:36
-
3\$\begingroup\$ Can we rename [dnd-next] to [dnd-next-playtest] before it's released? \$\endgroup\$ Jul 3 '14 at 18:36