4
\$\begingroup\$

I'm referring to this question from 2012: Tabletop Play Style Classification Schemes

It was mod-created to replace a previous question, and has attracted 1-3 high quality answers (going by votes). But it's also a list question, with the caveat that not many people have gone to the effort of answering well.

I suspect it should be closed as too broad (and not placed on historical lock, so that it can remain editable), and I'd usually just go ahead and vote that way and leave a comment, but I get the feeling I may be missing something this time.

Is this question worthwhile leaving open, or should it be closed as no longer meeting our quality standards?

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for asking. I got that feeling too when I recently linked to it, but the cognitive dissonance between how useful I've found it and its list-like-ness left me unsure what to really think. \$\endgroup\$
    – SevenSidedDie
    Nov 10, 2014 at 3:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SevenSidedDie I feel similarly, it is an excellent topic to cover \$\endgroup\$
    – doppelgreener
    Nov 10, 2014 at 5:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ As a matter of record: The question has been placed on historical lock at 03:38Z. (This question was asked at 1:58Z.) \$\endgroup\$
    – doppelgreener
    Nov 10, 2014 at 5:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why is it important that it still be editable? \$\endgroup\$
    – C. Ross
    Nov 10, 2014 at 18:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ @C.Ross so that it can be edited, and because it doesn't seem so bad a situation that editing needs to stop too. Either way though. \$\endgroup\$
    – doppelgreener
    Nov 11, 2014 at 3:40

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, it has been historical locked.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .