Just guessing. From the "too broad" definition:
There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.
I don't think there's too many answers to this, but if you want someone to write in an answer a small-to-giant-crunchy-org-management solution it'd be too much. I think that's easily tweaked for asking for preexisting rulesets that meet your criteria.
If the problem is "what you want is too big I don't think something like this exists" (which is likely), this is an incorrect use of close-too broad. Open with no answers is the proper response. Remember voters, "too broad" doesn't mean "he's looking for something too broad in scope to be likely," it means "the question as posed is too broad to answer in this format," and those are very different things.