22
\$\begingroup\$

this tag has been BURNINATED by TROGDOR


Unless anyone has any objections or wants to salvage/synonym somehow, I'm going to burninate it in a couple of days. Randomness itself doesn't seem like a useful area of expertise, and the tag isn't well-used.

It gets used beside and a lot and in a couple of questions about dice rolls, but all of those things are implicitly about randomness anyway.

For historical record, is attached to these 11 questions:

\$\endgroup\$
  • 8
    \$\begingroup\$ Sounds like a damn fine idea to me \$\endgroup\$ – Wibbs Jun 16 '15 at 12:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ It doesn't have a description. No wonder it'll be used incorrectly. \$\endgroup\$ – Joninean Jun 17 '15 at 6:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Joninean I'm not sure we have a useful 'correct' usage for this. \$\endgroup\$ – doppelgreener Jun 17 '15 at 6:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Burn it, with fire. \$\endgroup\$ – Tritium21 Jun 17 '15 at 8:25
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Trogdor! Trogdor! \$\endgroup\$ – Taejang Jun 18 '15 at 13:07
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I would probably suggest that in the wake of removing the tag, maybe add the "random" factor to the tag wiki? Especially since encounter-tables doesn't even have one. \$\endgroup\$ – Ben Jun 22 '15 at 22:32
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Burninating the taaags, he was a maaan... I mean he was a dragon man \$\endgroup\$ – Sandwich Jun 23 '15 at 21:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .