Suppose I wanted to put forth a policy for discussion, refinement, some sort of decision process, and eventually formal adoption/rejection. Say... a policy to explicitly allow tool-recommendation questions.
How would I do that? How do the arguments for and against get voiced? Is there a vote?
I imagine the policy posed as a "question" here in meta. Would there be two "answers", containing the arguments for and against? As community wikis? Or is each interested user likely to post his or her own "answer"/position statement?
What are our best practices on proposing policy, hearing and considering reasoned arguments for and against, and making a final-until-the-next-proposal-comes-'round decision?