The specific instance is here: Should I adjust encounter challenge for PCs with damage immunities?
The situation is that I was looking ideally for a RAW answer or clear-cut advice for handling the case I presented. What happened is that there's several answers posted that have fragments of what I'd consider a solid answer, but most of which also contain a lot of what I'd consider irrelevant-to-bad advice at handling the narrative background of my question.
I don't feel right checking off any of the given answers as correct, but if there were one incorporating the good points of each without the "chaff" of any of them, I'd consider the question answered.
Would it be correct to write an answer myself that encompasses all of these "correct" bits, credit the original authors and mark that as a solution? That feels a little...plagiaristic to me, but it's probably the only way this question is going to have an official answer.