13
\$\begingroup\$

I understand that at time questions are unclear, vague or unanswerable in their original state and need to be edited. I also see the value in the questions changing so much some of the answers don't answer the question anymore. However, there comes a point where we loose a good question, and its eventually answers, to editing a question into an entirely new question.

Are there any rules or suggestions posted that could give users, especially new ones, to let them know how/when a questions should be an edit and when it should be a new question?

I'm thinking specifically of this question: Strength or Dexterity Pact of the Blade warlock build?

Which started as a question about proficiencies and morphed into a build question.

\$\endgroup\$
15
\$\begingroup\$

Yes

Questions can be clarified, but new questions aren't clarifications and should be posted as separate, new questions.

The correct course of action is to revert to the last version that wasn't a different question. (Further edits may be appropriate to clean up, clarify, or whatever that revision still needs that didn't happen because of the new-question edits. This may be unnecessary if the question is closed or otherwise no longer of interest to the OP or anyone else.)

Discussion

This is a topic that comes up semi-regularly, though I think this is the first meta question that has directly asked whether completely changing a question is OK. Related meta questions (the first two are the closest to this one, but I don't think exactly the same):

In general, there can't be a general rule. The most workable guideline though appears to be “if it's a new question, it goes in a new question post”. In other words, it relies on the “I know it when I see it” sense of the community.

There are of course muddy cases, but the general guideline is the place to start. One muddy case I've seen is when a badly-asked question was so badly asked that fixing it basically created a completely different question — in that case, it was better to abandon it (and its multiple answers) as unfixable so it could start over in a fresh, new question post.

On the other hand, sometimes the clarification could have been guessed from the beginning, making it a true clarification and not just a new question, despite many answers initially guessing the wrong way. In that case, these related metas are relevant:

\$\endgroup\$
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Not to mention that when a question is that muddy, hold/close is needed to fix it before answers come in, and "don't answer questions that are that muddy/unclear." \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Sep 22 '16 at 18:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .