1
\$\begingroup\$

Apparently we had a tag on these questions:

We already have the tag for this stuff so I've burninated the tag and replaced it on these questions with .

I feel that is also way too generic a tag name to have around (or make a synonym of anything specific) since we could also have document templates, design templates, etc.

(This is tagged but the burnination has already been done.)

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Except many of these aren't characters, would creature-template be more accurate? \$\endgroup\$ – mxyzplk says reinstate Monica Feb 10 '17 at 13:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm with mxyzplk, PC's are creatures and so are most monsters. \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Feb 10 '17 at 14:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ @mxyzplk Sure, creature-templates works too. I figured monsters and miscellaneous summoned creatures are still characters in a practical sense. \$\endgroup\$ – doppelgreener Feb 10 '17 at 14:10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The tag wiki's usage guidance suggests it's for PCs, NPCs, and monsters, so it's at least using the tag as it was intended. I think to make it more discoverable a synonym involving [creature-template] would be a good idea, in whichever direction. (To my mind monsters are characters too, so I've no preference for one or the other as more correct.) \$\endgroup\$ – SevenSidedDie Feb 10 '17 at 15:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .