I have posted a reasonable Q, in my opinion: one that presents a line of reasoning, backed by rules, and asks for validation. However, I would like it to be removed. It's currently on hold.
The reason for removal is, I'm not willing to improve this Q to the standards of the Stack. As I have said above, I believe it is already reasonable. I am not willing to adjust to a discrepancy between me and the Stack in terms of question asking for this particular case, because I'm already aware of the uphill climb that particular resistance and refining is going to take.
In its current form, it is what the Stack considers to be low quality. Given the Q is on hold as opinion-based, the two answers that have been given must not be factually based but rather are simply opinions. Currently, they have a low upvote score (3 on one, 1 on the other).
It seems like a prime candidate for deletion, so, my Q here is simply, may the linked Q be deleted?