There is an antimagic-field tag that I've recently seen edited into a couple dozen questions. I searched and noticed that there are 300+ results for posts including "antimagic" and all but a handful of them are also tagged for dnd-5e, dnd-3.5e, or pathfinder.
By contrast, we don't have tags for counterspell or dispel-magic, yet there a few dozen more posts about D&D's counterspell than than antimagic field and 500+ about dispel magic. (I picked those two for contrast because they have similar use cases to antimagic field.) There is, however, a counterspelling tag that seems to sound system-agnostic, although there doesn't seem to be any tag associated with the dispel magic concept.
This scenario seems inconsistent to me for two reasons.
I thought we don't usually tag for system-specific concepts like one particular spell in one (admittedly overwhelmingly popular) family of games.
If we tag for that one particular spell (antimagic field), it seems we also ought to tag for those related spells that happen to be more popular topics here (counterspell and dispel magic).
If we're going to tag for a concept related to areas that suppress magic then I would think at the very least the tag should be named in a system-agnostic fashion, such as simply antimagic or magic-suppression along with any necessary helpful tag synonyms pointing to them.
What is the appropriate resolution to this (as I perceive it) inconsistent tag scenario?