2
\$\begingroup\$

I was just on the main site and saw a tag: dungeons-and-dragons-4e

It seems to me that it is practically identical to: dnd-4.0

I think the tags should be merged - with the vastly more popular dnd-4.0 taking over the newcomer. I've got edit privileges, but I don't want to abuse them. Is there some process I need to follow to change these?

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ FYI: currently there's still some experimenting/discussion going on with the dnd tags (long vs. short). See meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/669/proposed-tag-synonyms. \$\endgroup\$
    – yhw42
    Jan 11, 2011 at 21:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ To answer your question: check out tag synonyms. I think you need 2.5K rep to suggest them. \$\endgroup\$
    – yhw42
    Jan 11, 2011 at 21:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Brian Ballsun-Stanton, @ yhw42 - See why I asked in the first place? I've made the gist of these "comments" into an answer. You might want to edit that answer so it better reflects your opinion of the situation. I'll accept an answer tomorrow. \$\endgroup\$
    – gomad
    Jan 12, 2011 at 17:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ The great re-tagging just happened :) \$\endgroup\$ Jan 13, 2011 at 2:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Brian - and dnd-4e won? whatever \$\endgroup\$
    – Pat Ludwig
    Jan 13, 2011 at 4:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, basically. I wouldn't minded had dungeons-and-dragons-4e won, but I can deal with the extant ontology. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 23, 2011 at 4:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Search engine referrals are up significantly since the retagging. \$\endgroup\$
    – mxyzplk
    Jan 28, 2011 at 1:55

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

There is currently controversy surrounding tags and synonyms, so retagging (particularly the dnd-related family) is probably not a good idea right now.

The issue has been resolved by synonyms. Thanks!

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .