0
\$\begingroup\$

Inspired by the recent questions about overly strict implications of “spells do only what they say they do”: How can food created by a spell be destroyed? How can magical vines conjured by a spell be destroyed?

To my understanding it’s okay and even encouraged if a querent wants to limit the scope of their question. But when this limitation precludes every possible answer, how should we proceed?

Example: “how does this spell work in [edge case outside RAW]? I know the DM can just rule one way or the other, I’m not interested in that, I want a RAW answer I can take to any table.”

\$\endgroup\$

Browse other questions tagged .