Can my question about what D&D 5e build can summon all summonable monsters with the fewest possible levels be reopened?

Question

My question is here: What DnD 5e build (with minimum number of combined levels over all classes) is needed to summon all summonable monsters?

I do not believe my question needs any changes.

---

The question is totally answerable if you consider the question as given and not try to make say something it doesn't like what class do want, do you want use all summoning spells, summon all monster.

Here is a possible solution using DnD Core only.
Given Summoning is kind of vaguely defined in D&D 5e- I just considered it as creating any monster in the monster manual
Druid 20 Cleric 9

Giving you Conjure Animals which allows 1/4,1/2,1,2 Challenge Rating beasts.
Conjure Celestial using 9th level spell slot which allows 5th CR Celestial
Conjure Elemental
Conjure Fey
Create Undead which using a 9th level allows ghouls, ghasts, wrights, mummies.
Animate Dead which gives skeletons and zombies.

---

Can my question be reopened?

Answer 1

Experienced site users--importantly, ones with the privilege to cast close- and reopen-votes--think this question isn't currently in a good stat for the Stack. And I'm not sure I see anything here that's really designed to sway their opinions.

I think the question you're posing might find its best reception if viewed through the frame of a "theoretical character optimization" problem. And we've got some guidance on how to do those well.

I suggest taking a look there, taking a look at some of the highly-voted charop questions on the main site, then taking a look at your own question.

---

Alternatively...

you could kill your darling and start fresh.

Right now this meta post reads like "this is my question, even if it's a round peg and you're a square hole, how can we bang it in?"

It may be easier and more satisfying to take a moment and reset everything: edit this post to say

I want to see how a 5e character can summon the most things. How do I ask that question on mainsite to get good answers? (I think blah-blah does a lot, but here's why I think someone's going to do better, and I'm hoping to discover some amazing cheese that one of you comes up with.)

Answer 2

Unclear questions can be reopened once the unclear parts are clarified.

Your question has been asked twice (here and here), and both times been closed because it "needs details or clarity". The community feedback has been mostly unanimous in saying that the question is unclear. There are enough users here who don't understand your question, such that it had to be closed.

It can only be reopened once you clarify whatever issues are unclear to the site users. Those users are the ones who are expected to write answers. If you don't clarify the confusing parts, then it would remain unclear.

Usually it's expected that querents edit their own question so it can be reopened. Alternatively, you can instead leave clarifications in comments (or here in this meta question) and other site users can edit the question for you. And once it's edited to be clearer, then it can be reopened.

Based on what you've said so far, here is an example of what your question could be:

I want to build a character with every spell that summons creatures, without using Wish or magic items.

• This includes all conjuration spells that summon creatures, and all necromancy spells that make undead creatures.

• They don't need to summon everything simultaneously, so if a wizard had these spells in their spellbook, then it would qualify.

• Every summoned creature needs to have a stat block, so this does not include spells like Faithful Hound.

• No Unearthed Arcana.

What character (class levels, background, etc) do I need to do this? I want to achieve this with the fewest total levels, with multiclassing if necessary.

Is that similar to what you are asking? If not, please clarify what you are trying to ask.

Answer 3

You need to Edit the question to address the concerns

The question(s) have a great number of comments which are asking for clarifications which are necessary for the question to be clearly enough understood to be answerable. You need to edit the question so make it answerable. Specifically, we need to understand what it is to be answered.

Starting from your own meta question, taking some unaddressed comments, etc.:

• From your meta question's suggested answer: "Summoning is kind of vaguely defined in D&D 5e". This means you need to more clearly indicate what you mean and what you are trying to accomplish. Set bounds and you may want to use examples. (Conjure animals summons beasts, create undead is considered summoning undead, faithful hound is not because it isn't a stat block from MM, etc.)

• From a comment: "By "Summ[on]ing School" do you mean the School of Conjuration?" This may not be vital to the question, but it muddies the position you are coming from. As a reader I might think there's homebrew muddled in, or something else that isn't clear to me. That makes it harder to know what an answer is supposed to look like.

• From the main site question: "has to choose between demons and animals at level 4." What does this refer to? It is unfamiliar to me (and I'm sure other readers) so naming the class feature in question can be a great help in clarifying what you are saying.