## There is enough evidence to conclude that this question asks about the fifth edition of Dungeons & Dragons

Something to keep in mind: People agreeing with answers here does ***NOT*** mean the question should be immediately re-opened or kept closed. Some amount of time would need to pass before an actual consensus can be made, after which action could be taken.

This answer is not saying that adding the [tag:dnd-5e] tag doesn't violate policy. Doing so without consensus does violate the policy. This is trying to get a consensus.

> [...] we could allow system tags to be edited in without the OP’s input after a Meta discussion agrees that the situation is “safe” to edit. [...]

> [...] The policy exists as it does because we don’t have the best vision on any ad hoc decisions made by individual users and that’s a problem, but this isn’t a decision by any individual user—this is a Meta discussion, where we can gather consensus. [...]

----------

The Question As Originally Asked (emphasis all mine):

>  question about the **Wildemount Chronugy subclass ability chronal shift**
> 
> I was playing in a game with friends and I was playing as a **level 8 Chronugy wizard**, after a creature downed one of us our **bard** attempted to use **id insinuation** and it used a **legendary resistance**. my question was if I had used my **chronal shift** ability which allows me to **force a re roll on a saving throw.** my question is can I use my ability to force it to burn a resistance, and alternatively if I use it on a success and it fails can it choose to use a legendary resistance on the re roll.
> 
> I personally feel that it is OP if I can force it to **burn two resists**
> 
> but I also feel it is op if it can choose to resist my re roll power as it wastes my ability
> 
> I want to know if anyone has a RAW answer and if not, what people think of the problem

What we know:

* This game includes something that could be called a "Wildemount Chronugy subclass"

* This "subclass" has an ability called "chronal shift"

* This "chronugy subclass" somehow applies to "Wizards"

* This "chronal shift" ability forces rerolls on something called a "saving throw"

* This game includes "bards" who can use something called "id insinuation"

* This games involves something called "legendary resistance" which somehow affects something called a "saving throw" and is a limited resource

All of the above things exist in the fifth edition of Dungeons & Dragons.

"Wildemount" is a location/setting used in the *Explorer's Guide to Wildemonte* books, which was only published for 5e-dnd.

"Chronugy" is quite likely a misspelling of the word Chronurgy which happens to be a subclass of Wizards found in *Explorer's Guide to Wildemount*.

"Chronal Shift" is a class feature of that same Wizard subclass and it *does* involve the rerolling of saving throws.

"Bards" exists basically everywhere so that's no use.

"Id Insinuation" is a spell that can be found in an Unearthed Arcana for the 5e-dnd, though it can also be found many other places (like Pathfinder or older editions of DnD and elsewhere).

"Legendary Resistance" is a mechanic in D&D 5e that relates to saving throws and are a limited resource.

----------

Is it possible that the OP was using rules from multiple games and mixing them together without realizing? Yes.

Is it possible that the OP is playing some game I have never even heard of that actually uses all of these terms (or similar ones)? Yes.

Is it possible that the OP was asking about some other Wildemount thing and some Chronurgy subclass for a Wizard that that gets an ability called Chronal Shift which impacts something called a saving throw, all in a universe where Bards can use Id Insinuation and monsters can use a limited resource called Legendary Resistances that also impacts these saving throw things and *wasn't* talking about the fifth edition of Dungeons and Dragons? Yes.

Are any of those likely? We can't know (we don't have all the data in the universe).

Is there evidence enough to conclude that this game is the fifth edition of Dungeons & Dragons? I say yes.

[1]: https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/a/10086