I am seeing a trend that [is well illustrated by this question][1], where our reviewers seem to be forgetting about our meta discussion a while back about [the word Should.][2] 

There is no need to close that very useful question about what the best info is on a DM screen.  I am pretty sure that either the term *should* informed the reaction to it, or that an erroneous "that's a tool-rec question" assessment was made.  The use of a DM screen is a 40+ year old habit in our hobby, not just in D&D, and ***the person's problem to solve*** is "what is the best info to have there" and the accepted answer clarifies that nicely.  So do a few of the others.  There is no reason to close that question.  None.   

In an attempt to prevent further vandalism, I felt obliged to remove the term "should" via an edit form the title to forestall further knee jerk review responses.  I am calling on all reviewers to take a little more care in their efforts.  

And, please, everyone, read and Review the Meta that @Someone_Evil posted about [the word *Should*][2] a while back.   


  [1]: https://rpg.stackexchange.com/q/60386/22566
  [2]: https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/9344/22566