We have lots of similar questions that are not closed. No reason to close this one.
My answer is based on this revision, which is the one that got discussion to begin with.
Although there is no way to tell a priori, the number of possible ways to do that is quite short. An answer including all ways is completely feasible, as was shown by the answers already.
Yes, it should be closed until details are included
The question currently doesn't have a clear indication of what sources are available for a relevant answer and what levels they are at and playing to to understand the implications and risks of multiclassing.
While it could be answered without that, the potential answers grow and we see that even in the ...
I don't understand why you think this is a list question
The OP has a problem.
They want to use the feats Crusher and Elven Accuracy at the same time.
Crusher requires them to deal bludgeoning damage. Elven Accuracy requires them to use Dex, Wis, Int or Cha for the attack modifier.
There is no immediately obvious way to deal bludgeoning damage while using ...
I opened that question
Perhaps in retrospect I jumped the gun but I'm not about to undo it. I came across the question from the review queues. Typically I skip close/reopen reviews, I just check them to see if there is something I need to weigh in on.
What I saw was a question that IMO is completely answerable. There were a lot of comments asking for things ...
Because mods get a say too
Mods are allowed to be site participants like anyone else. When that comes to close and reopen voting, that means via their rep and election they get the equivalent of 5 votes. They don’t have to ask anyone’s permission to cast that vote.
When I was a mod it was customary to cast your close or open as you saw fit. Then if more ...