Timeline for Please stop wrongfully closing old, good Q&As
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2021 at 15:15 | answer | added | Thomas Markov | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 25, 2021 at 12:30 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @Akixkisu OK, thanks for the feedback. 🙂 | |
| Mar 24, 2021 at 23:03 | comment | added | Thomas Markov | @Akixkisu I’d still upvote it. Sometimes the answer is boring. Welcome to meta :P | |
| Mar 24, 2021 at 20:55 | comment | added | Akixkisu | @KorvinStarmast any answer that I would write would be: there is no such problem - the review queues are empty, moderation amounts have declined steadily. I don't think that it would be interesting. | |
| Mar 22, 2021 at 15:16 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @Akixkisu Thanks for you doing that, but given how long I've been reading this stack, seeing a change in habits goes back a lot longer than 2019. I think that Naut is right, you can choose to put that into an answer since the frame you choose doen influence your take that this isn't problem, or not as much of one as I feel that it is. | |
| Mar 22, 2021 at 15:01 | comment | added | NotArch | @Akixkisu That'd be great info for an answer. | |
| Mar 22, 2021 at 13:34 | answer | added | TylerH | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 21, 2021 at 13:10 | comment | added | Akixkisu | I looked through the last 40 pages of close votes, and I can confidently say that this is not a "trend". There are now fewer close votes in general - a trend that has been going on since the end of 2019, also refer to the "2020 in numbers" meta. | |
| Mar 16, 2021 at 22:09 | comment | added | Akixkisu | While the framing of the discussion-prompt is slightly jarring and ranty, the content and wanted discussion aren't problematic - they are appropriate and welcome :) -from review. | |
| Mar 16, 2021 at 20:07 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 21, 2021 at 3:03 | |||||
| Mar 15, 2021 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackRPG/status/1371430996214702087 | ||
| Mar 13, 2021 at 21:18 | history | edited | V2BlastMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 21:01 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @Akixkisu That's a good point on the edits not being helpful, but then again, not all editors engage in or read meta, and thus may not be aware of the trip wires on some questions . | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 19:21 | comment | added | Akixkisu | I think it was solely an issue due to edits 3 and 4. Poor editing obscures, and we only vote about the snapshot of one instance. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 19:00 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @Akiskisu No, it wasn't, and I noted that tag wasn't on it but good point on the edit history moving the target a bit. Was the tag there originally? Let me check the edit history. Hmm, I didn't see that tag edited in, so it was not there ever as far as I can tell. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 18:25 | comment | added | Akixkisu | On the broader statement, I see lots of tool recommendation questions in the queue and close them, as it is proper. Very few of them are edge cases, like this one. The arrival of a bad answer puts the question on the "home" page - the place where we do most things - so it is the best time to close something when its on there. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 18:16 | comment | added | Akixkisu | As far as I'm concerned, this was a tool rec question, but at the core had an interesting question to which it was adjusted over time. Your most recent change to it makes it no longer a tool rec question. Originally it wasn't a tool rec question, poor editing made it one. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 17:21 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 15:11 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 15:00 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:56 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:42 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @NautArch I added some clarification on the explicit question, since I think that will help demonstrate better what I am driving at, and we'll see. Thanks for the feedback. I am, as I am sure you noticed, frustrated by what I am seeing. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:41 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 460 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:38 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @NautArch The why is an estimate based on "at Stack Experience" and the actions being taken are wrongful and need to stop. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:33 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @NautArch This is a cultural problem in the current stack, as I see it, and it is related to the obsession with "wait, there's a rule" that I think is driving this. (That's my best estimate as an observer of the changes in tone as the years have gone by) We didn't have these problems for quite a while on this stack, but at one point the reviewers did seem to get hung up on the word "should" and I think it's happening again. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:31 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:30 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @NautArch Thanks, I felt a need to cut to the chase and issue a Call For Action up front, in the title. I didn't want to beat around the bush. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:29 | comment | added | NotArch | Okay, I personally like it better when there is a clear question for discussion rather than a statement about a dislike. You don't have to do that, but I think it is presents a better opportunity for us to talk about an issue. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:29 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | @NautArch This is a discussion prompt at what I see are wrongful review actions. We are allowed to do that on meta: this is not Jeopardy, I am not required to ask this in the form of a question. I have been watching this wrongful necromancy go on for a while as I go through the review queues, and I felt a need to Speak Up. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:19 | history | edited | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2021 at 14:12 | history | asked | KorvinStarmast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |