Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:45 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.stackexchange.com/
Aug 6, 2014 at 14:57 comment added aramis Judging from the score of your answer, @mxyzplk , it looks like we should be.
Aug 6, 2014 at 12:55 comment added mxyzplk Mod That's fine for them. We aren't doing that.
Jul 30, 2014 at 7:42 comment added aramis @mxyzplk the "format" is flat out being ignored on two other SE2.0 sites I've seen... and a couple of them explicitly encourage historical source analysis. I'm only active on 5 SE sites... and 3 more I occasionally answer on... and the ones that are out of beta, EXCEPT this one, all allow historical questions.
May 26, 2013 at 0:47 comment added George Spiceland I'm not for changing the bars to content, or the wording of the question, but I feel this particular question was of enough merit and worded well enough to justify leaving it open and available for answering.
May 25, 2013 at 20:37 comment added mxyzplk Mod No, it's coming from a couple random folks that don't understand the format. The old sites get that as much as the new. Don't kid yourself, voting here isn't going to cause us to remove standard SE bars for our content.
May 25, 2013 at 20:15 comment added SevenSidedDie Except that here, on the SE 2.0 sites, is where the pressure to change this is coming from.
May 25, 2013 at 19:34 comment added mxyzplk Mod I'm not interested in spending my time justifying long standing SE best practice. It you're truly curious go ask on meta.SE but here, we're taking the SE format as a given.
May 25, 2013 at 19:27 comment added starwed You are arguing by proxy here -- the SE policy exists for a reason, and it's worthwhile examining whether that reason still makes sense in this context. Simply pointing to a policy and saying that it "separates SEs from animals" is meaningless until you articulate why that is so.
May 25, 2013 at 18:50 history answered mxyzplkMod CC BY-SA 3.0