I've taken to when I reference page numbers, using code formatting to make it more evident, but different from normal emphasis. Especially since code formatting isn't really utilized on this SE. It's not been a problem before, but today my post was edited:

http://rpg.stackexchange.com/revisions/27794/2

I wouldn't have really paid attention, except for the comment seemed like an imperative. In the vein of the rule that we don't allow signatures. So I wanted to get clarity on this.

I've taken to when I reference page numbers, using code formatting to make it more evident, but different from normal emphasis. Especially since code formatting isn't really utilized on this SE. It's not been a problem before, but today my post was edited:

https://rpg.stackexchange.com/revisions/27794/2

I wouldn't have really paid attention, except for the comment seemed like an imperative. In the vein of the rule that we don't allow signatures. So I wanted to get clarity on this.

I've taken to when I reference page numbers, using code formatting to make it more evident, but different from normal emphasis. Especially since code formatting isn't really utilized on this SE. It's not been a problem before, but today my post was edited:

http://rpg.stackexchange.com/posts/27794/revisions

I wouldn't have really paid attention, except for the comment seemed like an imperative. In the vein of the rule that we don't allow signatures. So I wanted to get clarity on this.

I've taken to when I reference page numbers, using code formatting to make it more evident, but different from normal emphasis. Especially since code formatting isn't really utilized on this SE. It's not been a problem before, but today my post was edited:

http://rpg.stackexchange.com/revisions/27794/2

I wouldn't have really paid attention, except for the comment seemed like an imperative. In the vein of the rule that we don't allow signatures. So I wanted to get clarity on this.