Timeline for How should we deal with game-recs now that we have a notice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:26 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 9, 2014 at 13:08 | history | edited | wax eagle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 180 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2014 at 16:57 | comment | added | wax eagle | @SevenSidedDie it creates a permanent record on the user's profile, yes. It's not usually a big deal, but it's something that should be avoided for something like that. | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 16:55 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie | Flagging "needs mod attention" doesn't involve any kind of black mark, does it? | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 13:44 | comment | added | wax eagle | @JonathanHobbs aye, I just wanted to confirm that it's a bad option here. That's our official channel to get a mod's attention, and it's the only tool we have that actually fulfills what we need here. It's just a bad one to use in this case :( | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 13:44 | history | edited | wax eagle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2014 at 13:42 | comment | added | doppelgreener | Just a note I wasn't suggesting we flag anything! But yes, I think this is a good idea - including if at the very least >20k users could add post notices too! | |
| Apr 8, 2014 at 13:33 | history | answered | wax eagle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |