Timeline for should I post an answer to a slightly old question that already has some good answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 at 3:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackRPG/status/680231254952927232 | ||
| Dec 23, 2015 at 12:16 | vote | accept | trogdor | ||
| Dec 15, 2015 at 11:53 | comment | added | nitsua60 | yeah, there's not necessarily a "right" or "wrong" way to handle it. I recently had a similar-sounding experience with this question. I posted an answer, another posted an opposing answer. I actually came around to seeing the reasonableness of the opposing answer, urged some improvements to it (in comments), and waited a few days. When the second user didn't make any of those improvements I went ahead and posted the second of my answers. In the end voters have the arguments I think are worth considering, and the other user had a "fair chance." | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 5:22 | comment | added | trogdor | ok, so far the answer I have and the comments (and the links in said comments) are pretty helpful, but they also leave the argument sort of balanced either way. not necessarily a bad thing but I think I will wait a day or two to decide what to do. (the question I am talking about certainly isn't fresh enough to effect the decision anyway) should I link the question I mean or is it not as helpful as more general information? | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 2:36 | answer | added | nitsua60 | timeline score: 13 | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 2:34 | comment | added | nitsua60 | see also the answers and discussions here: meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/q/3571/23970 | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 2:28 | comment | added | nitsua60 | related: meta.rpg.stackexchange.com/a/5838/23970, specifically point #2 in SSD's answer. (Though it comes at your issue obliquely.) | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 0:54 | history | asked | trogdor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |