Timeline for Is asking about the distribution of saving throws across all books too broad for this site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2017 at 0:03 | comment | added | Miniman | @SevenSidedDie Yep, exactly. I'm not recommending anything, just trying to explain what I think happened here. | |
| Apr 15, 2017 at 18:11 | comment | added | SevenSidedDie Mod | @BlueMoon93 I don't think this is an approach though. It looks like an analysis of what happened. | |
| Apr 15, 2017 at 13:39 | comment | added | doppelgreener | "Lots of work required" is not, however, a close reason, neither is "requires people to go through and study and collate the material." Those are requirements that might deter answering, but they don't make the question inherently a problem for the site. | |
| Apr 15, 2017 at 10:10 | comment | added | BlueMoon93 | I quite disagree with your approach though. Why not favorite the questions and, if they turn out as problematic (long discussions, amassing downvoters, etc), flag it? A question should not be closed simply because it's a rare type, imho | |
| Apr 15, 2017 at 7:04 | history | answered | Miniman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |