Timeline for What to do about comment misuse?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2021 at 23:31 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 11, 2018 at 22:41 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 104 characters in body
|
| May 21, 2018 at 9:06 | comment | added | Tsaukpaetra | @Joe since comments are supposed to primarily be suggestions for improvement in the answer, it was my suggestion that a dictionary definition should be added to the answer to support it. | |
| May 20, 2018 at 8:56 | comment | added | Joe | @Tsaukpaetra, what does "drop a dictionary reference for comment supporting the reason this action is a misnomer" mean? I think I'm having a parsing problem here. | |
| May 13, 2018 at 17:41 | comment | added | Tsaukpaetra | Indeed, a "comment" implies discussion and discourse (for example, RFC). If that's not what comments are for, they should never have been called that in the first place. Oh, speaking of, suggestion for improvement: drop a dictionary reference for comment supporting the reason this action is a misnomer. | |
| May 1, 2018 at 20:16 | history | answered | Laurel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |