2
\$\begingroup\$

A user has recently asked these two questions:

In both questions, they articulate the rules of the game quite clearly, and then ask the stack to clarify that their understanding is correct. The wizard question, for example, ends with the query "Have I finally understood how to play a wizard?"

This format doesn't really present a problem which invites a solution - it presents a solution which invites validation. Whilst these questions might contain useful information for new players, they don't feel suited to SE's question and answer format. Should we generally close questions like this?


Related:

\$\endgroup\$
3
22
\$\begingroup\$

This category of question is on topic.

Stack Exchange's Q&A doesn't just take the form of question and answer. It also takes the form of problem and solution. This principle is why our topicality help says “You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face.” It's also the principle that allows frame challenges to exist: they come from a place of solving the problem over answering the question.

This means RPG.SE isn't just about people asking arbitrary questions and getting answers. It's about them expressing their problems to us, and us solving their problems as best as we can manage.

Those questions fit into this format pure and simple:

  • Problem: I'm not confident I understand this thing correctly. I'd like to express my conception to you and have you verify it, or correct me if I've misunderstood.
  • Solution: We address their level of understanding to confirm or deny whether it's accurate and help them understand, such as by making corrections or re-explaining stuff.

You could think of this as variation on “How does this thing work? Here's my research,” but where their research has already gotten them ≥90% of the way toward understanding things.

Whether the individual questions in this format are any good is a case by case matter, but the basic format of “confirm my understanding” is unequivocally on topic here, and we've been handling questions along these lines since forever.

Even if we were to just examine this only in the lens of Q&A and not problem-and-solution, “is this solution valid?” is definitively a question that can be answered, and that it's about validating something is neither here nor there.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Not sure if you want to add anything along these lines, but even as a native English speaker, sometimes the rules to D&D (to use but one example) are a little hard to parse; we have a lot of non native speakers who will have a similar, or greater difficult, to mine. It also took me a while to 'get' the rules for Golden Sky Stories. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 23 at 19:21
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Agree with everything you said, but I think that it's much clearer if you consider examples where the querent is wrong. Otherwise, this is a textbook example of "make your question clear" + "show the work you have already done". \$\endgroup\$
    – fectin
    Jul 23 at 22:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .